Dorking Out Episode 106: The Wrinkle In Time Edition

Hey there, dorks. We travel across the universe to review “A Wrinkle In Time,” starring Storm Reid, Deric McCabe, Levi Miller, Chris Pine, Reese Witherspoon, Mindy Kaling and Oprah Winfrey.

We hope you enjoy our dorky podcast. You can listen to us here, or you can find us on iTunes and Stitcher.

Dorking Out Episode 105: The Contender Deep Dorking Out Edition

Hey there, dorks. Friend of the show Margo D. from Book vs. Movie and Best Neighbors Podcast joins us to talk about 2000’s “The Contender,” starring Joan Allen, Jeff Bridges, Gary Goldman and a mustache-less Sam Elliott.

We hope you enjoy our dorky podcast. You can listen to us here, or you can find us on iTunes and Stitcher.

Dorking Out Episode 104: The Chris Wins The Oscar Pool And Named This Episode Edition

Hey there, dorks. What did you think of this year’s Oscars? We check in on our Oscar predictions (spoiler alert: we tied!), and we share our thoughts and feelings about the winners, losers, Jimmy Kimmel, the red carpet interviews, and the acceptance speeches. Oh, and Sonia maybe had a little wine during her Oscar Party … consider yourself warned.

Oh, and can Tiffany Haddish and Maya Ruldolpf host next year?

We hope you enjoy our dorky podcast. You can listen to us here, or you can find us on iTunes and Stitcher.


Dorking Out Episode 103: The Oscar Picks for the Unfixed Oscars Edition

Hey there, dorks. It’s the most wonderful time of the year! It’s Oscar time! As forever fans of the Academy Awards, we’ve got a respectable track record with our Oscar predictions, and we want to share our god-given talent with you, our favorite people. We offer up our best guesses for all 24 categories, not just the big acting categories.

Hosted by Jimmy Kimmel, the Academy Awards are Sunday, March 4 at 5 p.m. on ABC. After the show, we will record our thoughts and feelings about what we just saw, and go through our ballots to see how we did. You should join us! It’s fun!

We hope you enjoy our dorky podcast. You can listen to us here, or you can find us on iTunes and Stitcher.


Dorking Out Episode 102: The Dorks Fix The Oscars Edition

Hey there, dorks. We’re talking about the Oscars in this week’s podcast. FYI: We’ve totally fixed them. Our Oscars are waaaay better. We have three blog posts up detailing the new and improved Academy Awards to go along with the podcast.

We hope you enjoy our dorky podcast. You can listen to us here, or you can find us on iTunes and Stitcher.

Good News! We Fixed The Oscars! Part 3

Now that we’ve fixed the Academy Awards, what would the 2018 Oscars look like?

Part 3: The 2018 Oscars Winners If the Oscars Did It Right

So we’ve talked a lot of guff in part 1 and part 2 of this “We’re Fixing the Oscars” series. It’s time to put up and then shut up.

So, what would the 2018 Oscars look like if we had our way?

As things happen now every year in the last week of January, the Academy of Motion Pictures Arts and Sciences announces the nominees for that year’s Oscars, honoring the movies of the previous year.

What follows is a month of speculation and talk about who’s why these people and films were nominated, why those were not, who’s going to win, who should win, and who’s going to be robbed.

Then somewhere in the first week of March (March 4 this year) the Oscars are broadcast and we see who won.

A reasonable question is how do you provide an suspenseful, enjoyable show if everyone nominated gets an award? Where’s the drama of seeing who wins? We do it like this:

In January when nominations are revealed the AMPAS would have their usual announcement but not one person’s name would be mentioned. The only thing unveiled from the podium would be the list of films nominated for SOMETHING.

As we know from 2018’s nominations, Consolata Boyle is nominated for best costume design for “Victoria and Abdul.” So in our scenario the public would know “Victoria and Abdul” is on the list, but not know for what. Boyle’s name would be unmentioned. People seeing the “Victoria and Abdul” entry would naturally wonder does that mean Judy Dench’s performance as Victoria is in the Best Actress Category? Did the great dresses get Consolata Boyle a nomination? Best score? What?! TELL US!

Better watch March 4 to see. Then, it would be revealed “Victoria and Abdul” was only honored for costumes and make-up.

In 2018’s current nominations, “Blade Runner 2049” is up for special effects. In our Oscars, the public would only see “Blade Runner 2049” is on the list and was nominated for SOMETHING. Special effects? Harrison Ford as an old Rick Deckard? Is Roger Deakins finally going to get his richly deserved cinematography award? Who knows.

Better watch March 4 to see.

Hey look, “Get Out” is on the list. Think it was for make-up or sound design? Probably, because when was the last time a writer or director was nominated for a horror film? Jordan Peele probably got shut out.

But better watch March 4 because… who knows?

Under these guidelines, the 2018 Oscar Nominees would be these. We’re including documentary and short films because they’re filmmaking too damnit show some respect you celebrity chasing click-monsters!… And now the nominees for the 2018 Oscars Done Right:

Abacus: Small Enough to Jail

All the Money in the World

Baby Driver

Beauty and the Beast

Blade Runner 2049

Call Me by Your Name


Darkest Hour

Dear Basketball

DeKalb Elementary



Faces Places

A Fantastic Woman


Garden Party

Get Out

Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 2

Heaven is a Traffic Jam on the 405


I Tonya


Knife Skills

Kong: Skull Island

Lady Bird

Last Men in Aleppo




Loving Vincent


Molly’s Game


My Nephew Emmett

Negative Space

On Body and Soul

Phantom Thread

Revolting Rhymes

Roman J. Israel  Esq.

Star Wars: The Last Jedi

Strong Island

Big Sick, The

Boss Baby, The

Breadwinner, The

Disaster Artist, The

Eleven O’Clock, The

Florida Project, The

Greatest Showman, The

Insult, The

Post, The

Shape of Water, The

Silent Child, The

Square, The

Three Billboards Outside Ebbing, Missouri

Traffic Stop

Victoria and Abdul

War for the Planet of the Apes

Watu Wote/All of Us



Who would win? You HAVE TO WATCH. And for Hollywood, there would be NO way for actors, directors and directors to know if they had won except for simply showing up.

In a town full of fabulous egos, Oscar night would go from an occasion where 20 actors show up because they know they’re nominated to a night where thousands actors show up because that tiny ego voice in their head told them maybe, possibly, probably they’re going to get an Oscar.

The drama of revealing the five best actors or five best actresses would be like watching the ‘…And the Oscar goes to …” moment times 20. This year, Margot Robbie and Saoirse Ronan would win.

In three hours Jordan Peele would go from half of a comedy duo with a cancelled Comedy Central show to an Oscar-winning writer and director in one evening.

It would be pandemonium. It would wash all politics off Twitter for a few hours. It would be fantastic TV.

So, after all this, what might the Oscars look like if they did it our way?

The Dorking Out-Style 2018 Oscar Award Winners:

Film of the Year 2017:

Get Out

Retro Oscar:



Baby Driver


John Wick 2

Children’s films:


Paddington 2


The Big Sick

The Disaster Artist

Logan Lucky

Comic Book Films:

Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 2


Spiderman: Homecoming

Thor: Ragnarok

Wonder Woman


Call Me By Your Name

I, Tonya

Lady Bird

The Phantom Thread

Three Billboards Outside Ebbing, Missouri


Abacus: Small Enough to Jail

Faces Places


Last Men in Aleppo

Strong Island


Battle of the Sexes

The Darkest Hour

The Disaster Artist


The Post


Get Out


The Killing of a Sacred Deer


The Greatest Showman

Beauty and the Beast

Science Fiction/Fantasy:

Blade Runner 2049

The Shape of Water

Star Wars: The Last Jedi

War for the Planet of the Apes





As you can see, this method honors the best movies, but also produces useful lists for both casual and ardent moviegoers of movies they may enjoy but missed.

How would the other major categories shake out? Well, we wouldn’t be limited to five nominees per category. Ten years ago, the Academy expanded their nominees in the Best Picture category, but instead of including a variety of movies, they just nominate more of the same Oscar-bait movies they always nominate.

Our categories are flexible. Maybe there’s just one performance, maybe there’s five. Maybe there’s six directors, maybe even more.

And, we’d recognize more performance such as Bob Odenkirk from “The Post” or Algee Smith in “Detroit.”

It would look like this:

Lead Actor (Fictional Character):

Timothée Chalamet, Call Me by Your Name

Daniel Day-Lewis, Phantom Thread

Daniel Kaluuya, Get Out

Lead Actor (Historical Character):

Gary Oldman, Darkest Hour

Tom Hanks, The Post

Algee Smith, Detroit

Lead Actress (Fictional Character):

Sally Hawkins, The Shape of Water

Frances McDormand, Three Billboards Outside Ebbing, Missouri

Saoirse Ronan, Lady Bird

Lead Actress (Historical Character):

Margot Robbie, I, Tonya

Meryl Streep, The Post

Supporting Actor (Fictional Character):

Willem Dafoe, The Florida Project

Woody Harrelson, Three Billboards Outside Ebbing, Missouri

Mark Hamill, Star Wars: The Last Jedi

Richard Jenkins, The Shape of Water

Sam Rockwell, Three Billboards Outside Ebbing, Missouri

Supporting Actor (Historical Character):

Christopher Plummer, All the Money in the World

Bob Odenkirk, The Post

Supporting Actress (Fictional Character):

Mary J. Blige, Mudbound

Lesley Manville, Phantom Thread

Laurie Metcalf, Lady Bird

Octavia Spencer, The Shape of Water

Supporting Actress (Historical Character):

Allison Janney, I, Tonya


Dunkirk, Christopher Nolan

Get Out, Jordan Peele

Lady Bird, Greta Gerwig

Phantom Thread, Paul Thomas Anderson

The Shape of Water, Guillermo del Toro

Kathryn Bigelow, Detroit

Patty Jenkins, Wonder Woman





We think that about covers it. We could dive into each category, but as things shape up now, we feel confident the nominees-get-oscars system is perfect for the all the technical awards, the costumes, music, etc. For some reason, those categories are usually pretty spot-on anyway.

Let’s also wrap up by acknowledging our changes don’t fix the disparate appearance of women and filmmakers of color. That’s because Hollywood is famously AWFUL at hiring woman and filmmakers of color. The Oscars can only nominate what movies get released.

The studios and production houses decide who gets the opportunity to make a movie. Go yell at them (2017 especially has revealed MANY of them have it coming).

We’ll be discussing this on an episode of our podcast. You can find the show HERE and the episode HERE.

Now go tell the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences and thanks for reading.

Good News! We Fixed The Oscars! Part 2

The key to honoring movies in a real way is to recognize the differences and find the best in EVERY genre. Now just British People Problems™

It’s an Honor to be Nominated

Tease them as we like, critics are great because they call out bullshit.

One of the best arguments they have against the Oscars is the absurd spectacle of so many movies with different goals, methods, audiences and tones being shoved into one category: Best Picture.

How are we supposed to choose between “Pulp Fiction” and “Forrest Gump?” What aspect of filmmaking or human experience helps you choose between “Hidden Figures” and “The Arrival?” “12 Years a Slave” and “Gravity?”

The critics are right. We just can’t, so let’s stop.

According to the film data researcher Stephen Fellow’s great blog in 2016, there were 736 films released in U.S. theaters. That’s TWICE what it was just in 2000.

So if a drama or comedy or horror or science fiction film finds itself in the best picture category, chances are they’re the best drama or comedy or horror or science fiction film of the year. They’re in the literal top 1 percent.

That brings us to our first big change:

1 Nomination = 1 Oscar

It might sound strange at first, but if a movie is good enough to be nominated for best picture, it’s good enough for an Oscar. Being nominated really would be the honor.

Yes, yes, this sounds like the worst kind of “everyone gets a prize” mentality, but consider this: There are great years where multiple classics get nominated. They shouldn’t be penalized for some random act of release date.

This is why “Gone with the Wind” has a Best Picture Award but “The Wizard of Oz” does not. What movie had given more to the culture?

This would also stop the ridiculous faux-fights between movies because they both can’t win. If “Moonlight” moved you and you want it to win, how does that make “La La Land” an unforgivable travesty against film? “Unforgiven” and “A Few Good Men” are both the best Hollywood can produce. But because of a quirk of release dates, only Clint Eastwood got the Oscar that year.

And take this year. For my money, “Get Out,” “Lady Bird” and “The Shape of Water” highlight the best film has to offer. They showcase the strange, the touching, the disparate and the bizarre possibilities in film. There is no rational or even emotional way to choose the merits of one over the other.

So let’s just stop. They all deserve to be cherished and if they earn that, they should get a shiny statue if we’re already giving them out.

Stop Genre Fighting: The Oscars for Science Fiction/Fantasy go to…

In Part 1 we’ve established (thanks for the help, Tim) the Academy of Motion Pictures Arts and Sciences has, because of toxic levels of self-importance, narrowed most of film “greatness” to dramas, often about British people. Let’s just stop that too.

So in addition to the best picture category let’s swipe a few items from the Golden Globes, Academy Awards of decades past, and keep just a bit from how the Oscars currently do things.

The Academy already recognizes the meaningful differences between animated films, documentaries, foreign films and English-speaking live action films. In the first Oscars, there was a category for best director of a comedy picture. There was once also best dance direction. The Golden Globes already have the good sense to have a best picture-drama and a best picture-comedy.

Let’s just take these good starts and do what needs to be done. The top five movies in each of these genres would get Oscar recognition:


Children’s Films


Comic Book






Science Fiction/Fantasy



Obviously, some years a few of these categories don’t produce enough watchable movies to justify our wider level of recognition. I suspect the fourth best Western on 2016 or the third best musical of 2017 might not be that great. So, as in years past the Academy could trim those out or have fewer than five nominees. And some might quibble with a full Western or Comic Book category, but these are major American cinema genres which have both shaped the course of this whole industry. They deserve to be recognized.

This set-up would also allow the Academy voters bestow gold on the stuffy British dramas they love so much while the rest of us would get to see worthy entries from the whole kingdom of film recognized.

Academy Award for Film of the Year

Now if Oscar traditionalist still want one uber category where films from different genres compete, we suggest this:

Change Best Picture to Film of the Year.

It might seem like a small difference, but films do have their moments. At the time it was released, setting off a wave of enthusiasm and passion, “Titanic” seemed like a film or the ages. While we still defend “Titanic,” it’s safe to say “L.A. Confidential” is a better, more meaningful film. But that’ doesn’t change the reality “Titanic” was THE movie of 1997.

If past Oscars had played along these rules, enduring classics like “Citizen Kane,” “Mr. Smith Goes to Washington,” “The Wizard of Oz,” “Airplane!,” “The Exorcist,” “Star Wars,” “2001: A Space Odyssey,” “ET: The Extra Terrestrial,” “Gaslight,” “L.A. Confidential” and a bazillion others would have been honored as they should.

Correcting Our Mistakes: The Retro Oscar

Warren Beatty, writer/director/actor, said this about making movies: “I think you don’t really know what you’ve done until 10 or 15 years after a movie.”

We think that’s true, which is why we would like introduce the Retro Oscar, which revisits the movies and performances from a decade earlier.

Like a fine wine, some movies just age better. Best Picture winning “Crash” (2006), for example, has not aged well. “Brokeback Mountain” is a movie that people still talk about. It’s still relevant. Nobody talks about “Crash,” other than “Remember that bullshit when ‘Crash’ beat ‘Brokeback Mountain’ for Best Picture?”

In years past, it’s safe to say “The Wizard of Oz” would have been recognized for the achievement it was in 1949, “Citizen Kane” in 1952, “The Ten Commandments” in 1967, “2001: A Space Odyssey” in 1979, “Raging Bull” in 1990, “Blade Runner” in 1992, “Godfellas” in 2000, L.A. Confidential in 2007, and “The Dark Knight” (not even NOMINATED!) next year.

Let’s go back 10 years …

The Coen Brothers’ terrific “No Country For Old Men” won Best Picture in 2008. That’s a pretty great movie. You know what else was nominated that year: “There Will Be Blood!” So was “Atonement,” “Juno” and “Michael Clayton” (?!) — No one is talking about those movies anymore. Not nominated: “Zodiac,” which has only seen admiration grow for it throughout the decade.

This year’s Retro Oscar would go to “Zodiac.”

Let’s Dial it up to 11: The Deca Oscar

One of the reasons we’ve thought so much about this, and invented the Retro Oscar, is because movies age and change and rise in different ways. So let’s take it a step further: The Deca Oscar.

The year after a decade has ended, all the nominees from that decade’s Film of the Year nominees would compete for the Deca Oscar. Different eras are defined by different movies, and this would recognize that in an interesting way. Also, and this is a entertainment industry trade secret, the 100-nominee list for the Deca Oscar would generate more argument and comment, more revisiting and re-evaluating than we can shake Walt Disney’s Oscars at.

Obviously “Gone with the Wind” would take the Deca Oscar at the 1941 Awards. But what film best defined the 1940s? “Casablanca” or “Citizen Kane”? The 1970s is awash in towering classics. Did“Star Wars” epitomize the new direction of film, or “The Godfather” embody the corrupt darkness of the Nixon era?

Let’s look an era closer to us. When the 2001 Oscars rolled around, what film should be honored for the 1990s? In many ways, it was Quentin Tarantino’s decade. Should “Pulp Fiction,” with all its influence, get the Deca Oscar? Of course, “Pulp Fiction” stood on the shoulders of Martin Scorsese, so what about his movie “Goodfellas?” Pixar began its magical run. What about “Toy Story?” Or what about a movie not nominated at all in its year, the legit classic “Groundhog’s Day.”

In 2011, we would the massive spectacle of James Cameron’s “Avatar” exert itself for the movie of the 2000s? Or would the pop culture mixed with terrorism allegory of “The Dark Knight” best embody that time? Would “There Will Be Blood” be recognized, or the superhero movie as family drama “The Incredibles?” And then there’s the next 96 nominees to think about.

Best Performance of a Historical Figure

That brings us to actors.

While we feel the “top five get awards” change would go a long way to reforming the Oscars into something meaningful, any discussion on fixing all this must include an idea from Stephen Thompson (@idislikestephen), one of the hosts of NPR’s Pop Culture Happy Hour.

As he astutely laid out in their February 9 discussion of Gary Oldman in “The Darkest Hour,” “the Oscars overweigh the art of imitation. When you have an actor come in and do a spot on and heavily prostheticed, perfect imitation of a historic figure, it tends to get treated as more acting instead of what I think it is which is less acting. It’s impersonation. We just had the Grammys. They did not give a Grammy Award for best cover band.”

Think about the absurdity our current five-actors-fight-it-out has led to in the past. In 2012 Meryl Streep won for playing Margret Thatcher in the platonically forgettable “The Iron Lady” while Rooney Mara created an electric and unique performance as Lisbeth Salander in “The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo.” How does this look just five years later?

While of course it’s not Streep’s fault for being nominated, of her 21 nominations, almost 30 percent are for playing real people.

This year, what sense does it make to see Margot Robbie’s Tonya Harding performance go up against Sally Hawkins’s mute and lyrical “Shape of Water” turn. Then answer is none.

Now Repeat…

So rather than dig into the writing/directing/music categories, you an see the idea here. Directors don’t have to fight it out. Scorsese can win for “GoodFellas” and Kevin Costner can win for “Dances with Wolves.”

And look at this: Of the 450 or so people nominated for best directors, women would have five whole Oscars instead of just the one they have now! (Kathryn Bigelow won for “The Hurt Locker” in 2010… that’s the whole winner’s list).

Look, we can’t solve all of Hollywood’s problems in three blog posts.

Now while these changes might make things more fair and reasonable, wouldn’t it make an already boring show thoroughly intolerable and excruciatingly long?

No. If you do it as we suggest, Hollywood tear itself apart with wonder, fear, anticipation, bonkers celebrity excess AND legit artistic achievement. Who doesn’t like that?

How, you ask? That comes in Part 3.

Dorking Out Episode 101: The Deep Dorking Superman Edition

Hey there, dorks. BFF of the show Jeff Bond, author of “The Music Of Star Trek,” “The Art of Star Trek: The Kelvin Timeline” and “The World Of Orville,” and host of the podcast The Bond Of Geekdom, joins us for a deep dorking out about 1978’s “Superman: The Movie,” starring Christopher Reeve, Margo Kidder, Gene Hackman and Marlon Brando.

We hope you enjoy our dorky podcast. You can listen to us here, or you can find us on iTunes and Stitcher.

Good News! We Fixed The Oscars! Part 1

Every year around this time the same talking point arises and it’s this:

The Oscars are stupid. Giving awards for artistic merit is like ranking your favorite sunset against the best Beatles song ever written. The whole idea is crass, pointless and probably impossible.

Like many things in life, there’s a lot of merit to this realization. It’s also horseshit.

We are a minor Emmy-Winning Self-Satisfied Filmmaker™ and somewhat accomplished blogger. Both of us amateur bloviators (hoping to go pro, fingers crossed!) we suspect you can agree with us on this:

Some studios and creative teams work to bring us Charlie Sheen in “9/11” or the industrial-grade cynicism of “The Emoji Movie. Others work to bring us the charmed delights of “La La Land,” the fraught genre thrills of “Get Out” or the beautifully observed human portraits in “Lady Bird” or “Moonlight.” Forgetting the former and giving SOME recognition to the latter is meaningful.

Making good things is hard. Doing it in Hollywood is nearly is nearly impossible. You’ve seen and forgotten “Justice League.” You know what we’re saying. Pushing against all the forces of pabulum and economics to bring us something like “The Shape of Water” or “Coco” gives us all something to celebrate. When done right, the best movies can last for the better part of a century.

But the Academy Awards as they stand today give recognizing cinematic worth an awful name. Harvey Weinstein has more Oscars (one) than Stanley Kubrick (none. NONE!). This is a system that pitted “La La Land” against “Moonlight,” “Schindler’s List” against “The Fugitive” (?!) and “Star Wars” against “Annie Hall.” How are we honoring greatness when each of these movies has stood the test of time as some kind of classic (okay, fine, a minor action classic for The Fugitive…)

Add to this Hollywood’s insufferable level of self-regard when it comes to bestowing gold on worthy movies. Some years it seems the more depressing and bleak, the better your chances (“Ordinary People,” “Schindler’s List,” “The Deer Hunter,” “The Killing Fields”…). Even better if you’ve got a British person with problems (“Theory of Everything,” “The King’s Speech,” “A Passage to India,” “The English Patient,” “Chariots of Fire” and probably 30 more). If they can wear frilly costumes, you’re almost there (“Shakespeare in Love,” “Dangerous Liaisons,” “Howard’s End,” “The Piano” and “Remains of the Day” BOTH in 1993…).

Of course, those movies are worthy respect. But they’re a sliver of human experience. We laugh, we sing, we imagine, we get frightened, and we enjoy the thrills only film can bring us. But you wouldn’t know it from the Oscars.

Tim Dirks (@AMC_Filmsite) at has written up a fantastic analysis, so I’ll link it here and hit the toplines. As far as The Academy goes, comedies, animated films, musicals, science fiction, fantasy horror and family movies need not apply. Think about how much of filmmaking that encompasses.

Only one musical has won best picture since 1970. More silent films have won best picture (two) than science fiction films (streak remains unbroken at ZERO). Only one comedy has won since the 1970s — that famous laugh riot “The Artist” (2011). “2001: A Space Odyssey” wasn’t even NOMINATED for best picture. Horror classics like “Psycho” (1960), “Alien” (1979) and “The Shining” (1980) also weren’t nominated. The closest thing to an action movie to ever win an Oscar is “Titanic” (1997).

So we’re going to have to take this down to the studs and totally rebuild it.

That’s Part 2.

Dorking Out Episode 100: The Wakanda Forever, Black Panther Edition

Hey there, dorks. Chris and Sonia review the 18th (!) installment in the Marvel Cinematic Universe, BLACK PANTHER. Directed by Ryan Coogler, BLACK PANTHER stars Chad Boseman, Michael B. Jordan, Lupita Nyong’o, Danai Gurira, Martin Freeman. Daniel Kaluuya. Letitia Wright, Forest Whitaker, and Angela Bassett.

We hope you enjoy our dorky podcast. You can listen to us here, or you can find us on iTunes and Stitcher.